The Trump administration’s revived plan to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is stoking fresh debate in Washington and on Wall Street, with experts warning that such a move could push mortgage rates higher and pose new challenges for homebuyers across the country. At the heart of the discussion lies a pivotal question: Can the U.S. housing market handle a shift away from government-backed mortgage guarantees?
The U.S. homebuilding sector found a modest silver lining in former President Donald Trump’s latest wave of tariff announcements. While much of the construction industry braces for higher costs, one crucial material—Canadian lumber—was notably spared from additional duties. That exemption, however, isn’t enough to ease broader concerns across the housing market, where rising costs and slowing demand are already testing builders' limits.
The U.S. homebuilding sector is feeling the heat as fresh tariff threats from former President Donald Trump’s policy platform stir up anxiety over rising construction costs, casting a shadow over what was shaping up to be a fragile housing market recovery. Shares of major homebuilders—like D.R. Horton, Lennar, PulteGroup, Toll Brothers, KB Home, Taylor Morrison, and Meritage Homes—have slid noticeably in recent days as investors weigh the potential financial fallout from escalating trade measures.
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has rescinded a number of appraisal policies instituted during the Biden Administration. In a Mortgagee Letter released last week, FHA rescinded three previous Mortgagee Letters released during the previous administration, effectively restoring the policies in place prior to these three letters.
Mortgage professionals can now access FICO’s Score Mortgage Simulator on the Xactus360 Verification Platform, the companies announced earlier this month. FICO announced the tool in October. It’s designed to simulate potential impacts to a consumer’s FICO score with hypothetical changes in credit report data. Examples include a potential borrower reducing their credit card balance or getting rid of a collection account.
I have spent a lot of time reading the new Single Family Handbook (SFH) 4000.1 over the last several weeks to primarily pick up the changes from the HUD – 4155.1 and HUD – 4155.2 and the many mortgagee letters (ML) in use. In my opinion there are about one hundred (100) changes going to take place and effective September 14, 2015. All Mortgage Loan Originators (MLOS), mortgage processors and Direct Endorsed underwriters need to know the changes.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
When credit scores are obtainable it must be used to determine eligibility for FHA insured mortgage loans. The scores used are the middle score for a borrower with three scores, or the lower score when a borrower only has two scores. After examining each borrower’s credit in the transaction a decision score must be determined. A mortgage transaction multiple borrowers you must use the middle or lowest score for the borrowers, The decision score determines the loan to value and the pricing of the loan since most mortgages are risk based pricing.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
From a mortgage approval standpoint I still find that most mortgage professionals are still stuck in the wonderful world of AUS. As in bygone days, they believe that if a case receives an automated underwriting approval then the case will be approved, no questions asked, no additional documentation required. Well, I am here to tell you, that’s just not the case.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Recently in the news were photographs of different locations in the United States that had an inordinate amount of rain resulting in flooding. In addition numerous tornadoes are hitting various places in the United States and we are now in hurricane season (June 1 to November 30). If a location of the United States is declared a “presidentially declared federal disaster area” and the borrower’s home was materially damaged or destroyed the homeowner and/or tenant(s) can buy another dwelling using the 203(h) section of the act.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
The current underwriting manuals HUD 4155.1 and HUD 4155.2 are being replaced by HUD’s Single Family Handbook (SFH) 4000.1. There are approximately 100 changes from the old books to the new book. There are parts of the SFH in effect now and all of the book will be in effect with cases issued on or after September 14, 2015. There are parts of the SFH in effect already with lion share in effect in September 2015.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Federal inspectors are taking the United States Treasury Department to task for not doing enough to increase participation in the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) which helps keep homeowners out of foreclosure. Borrowers having trouble paying their monthly payment can apply for a HAMP for a loan modification that lowers their monthly payment. So far, 1.5 million homeowners have received HAMP modifications, about half as many as originally predicted by the Treasury. The department has repeatedly extended the program’s initial December 2013 deadline; HAMP iis now scheduled to expire in December 2016.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Yes, Super Storm Sandy or Hurricane Sandy struck the Northeastern United States on October 29, 2012 and there are still many problems resulting from the storm. The first problem is the federal agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency and their National Flood Insurance Program. Many policy holders had their engineers reports altered after the fact and their claims were denied or drastically reduced. This was exposed on several news shows. Now FEMA is reopening over $140,000 flood insurance claims. The head of FEMA resigned over this.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
In much of the United States there are ugly abandoned homes filled with tales of woe, and sometimes a lot of stench and garbage. The banks eventually take these properties over, but only after the foreclosure process runs its course.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
On April 30, 2015, HUD announced a delay in the implementation of the new Single Family Handbook (SFH) 4000.1. The original date was June 15, 2015 and now the new date is September 14, 2015.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.