The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has rescinded a number of appraisal policies instituted during the Biden Administration. In a Mortgagee Letter released last week, FHA rescinded three previous Mortgagee Letters released during the previous administration, effectively restoring the policies in place prior to these three letters.
Mortgage professionals can now access FICO’s Score Mortgage Simulator on the Xactus360 Verification Platform, the companies announced earlier this month. FICO announced the tool in October. It’s designed to simulate potential impacts to a consumer’s FICO score with hypothetical changes in credit report data. Examples include a potential borrower reducing their credit card balance or getting rid of a collection account.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reported strong financial results for 2024, in what could be the last annual report for the enterprises under government conservatorship. Fannie Mae booked net income of just under $17 billion for the full year, about 2 percent below what it reported in 2023. In its statement, Fannie said last year’s performance was driven by guaranty fee income on its $4 trillion guaranty book of business, “consistent with the transformation of our business model that began well over a decade ago.”
Within days of the introduction of legislation to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the agency’s director was let go by President Donald Trump. Neither action was surprising to those paying attention to the new administration or the Republican-controlled Congress. The agency has been a point of contention in Congress since it was formed as part of Dodd-Frank in 2010.
As new President Donald Trump tapped a new director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the agency has hit the brakes on a major initiative. Trump announced a few days before his January 20 inauguration that he was nominating Bill Pulte to lead FHFA. If confirmed by the Senate, he would replace Sandra Thompson, who resigned just prior to Inauguration Day.
Hello to all! My name is Jane Harford. I am a new blogger for NAMP. My 30 years in the mortgage business have provided much experience - great and awful. As we know, the business cycles in this business are feast or famine. Business is either very good or very bad.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Today’s blog post will deal with more details on the new GFE and the issues that are being raised. Due to the numerous laws and system changes the lenders, brokers and correspondents have to complete to remain in compliance with the new RESPA laws.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
In today’s blog we will see, how the changes to the RESPA laws have affected the GFE and the HUD1, we will quickly review the changes that have taken place so far and how these changes have affected the work flow, fees that can be charged and the timeframes required to maintain compliance.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
As most of you are aware, I teach a few government underwriting classes for FHA Online University. Very recently while teaching the underwriting courses I have decided that there are two types of underwriters, those that embrace underwriting in the truest sense of the word and by that I mean underwriting beyond the AUS finding and those underwriters that still embrace the AUS as the literal decision and by this I mean an underwriter that has chosen to remove themselves from the underwriting process to act solely as one who validates the AUS, which has made the decision.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
There’s no question credit underwriting guidelines have tightened. So much so that a person pretty much needs excellent credit just to be able to refinance to a lower interest rate nowadays. Occasionally, I receive inquiries from people asking for advice on what to tell former clients who are facing foreclosure due to financial struggles because we have few if any lending options remaining to help them.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Hello Everybody – Cannot believe 2009 is going by so fast. As I stated last week – not much is really going on with changing guidelines, etc. with FHA, which is why I am going back to basics for a few weeks. Sometimes it is the basic that can be the most confusing.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.