The housing and mortgage industries have seen a surge in demand for rural homes since the COVID pandemic, according to Fannie Mae research. The main factor helping increase rural housing demand was the opportunity many were given to work remotely. Demand for space and low mortgage rates also contributed, though those trends bolstered home buying in all areas in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic.
A Fannie Mae survey of mortgage executives shows wide support for standardizing and simplifying the language around closing costs and fees. The survey of senior mortgage executives, conducted in July, found that 60 percent of respondents said closing costs are easy to estimate, and 50 percent said they are easy to explain.
More data released so far this month has reinforced the trend that mortgage processors and underwriters have been keeping busy lately with home refinance loans. Optimal Blue, a mortgage analytics provider, reported a surge in refinance volume in its September Mortgage Data Report.
A group of Democrat U.S. senators expressed a lack of patience with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) in implementing updated energy standards for new homes backed by the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). The seven senators sent a letter to FHFA Director Sandra Thompson last week urging the agency to set minimum standards, a move that has been debated for much of the past year.
While escalating home values have made buying more challenging for many consumers, they have had one major benefit: home equity. And, according to the latest CoreLogic Homeowner Equity Insights report, the average U.S. mortgagee increased their home equity by $25,000 in the last year. CoreLogic analysis shows U.S. homeowners with mortgages (roughly 62 percent of all properties) have seen their equity increase by a total of $1.3 trillion since the second quarter of 2023.
Hello to all! My name is Jane Harford. I am a new blogger for NAMP. My 30 years in the mortgage business have provided much experience - great and awful. As we know, the business cycles in this business are feast or famine. Business is either very good or very bad.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Today’s blog post will deal with more details on the new GFE and the issues that are being raised. Due to the numerous laws and system changes the lenders, brokers and correspondents have to complete to remain in compliance with the new RESPA laws.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
In today’s blog we will see, how the changes to the RESPA laws have affected the GFE and the HUD1, we will quickly review the changes that have taken place so far and how these changes have affected the work flow, fees that can be charged and the timeframes required to maintain compliance.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
As most of you are aware, I teach a few government underwriting classes for FHA Online University. Very recently while teaching the underwriting courses I have decided that there are two types of underwriters, those that embrace underwriting in the truest sense of the word and by that I mean underwriting beyond the AUS finding and those underwriters that still embrace the AUS as the literal decision and by this I mean an underwriter that has chosen to remove themselves from the underwriting process to act solely as one who validates the AUS, which has made the decision.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
There’s no question credit underwriting guidelines have tightened. So much so that a person pretty much needs excellent credit just to be able to refinance to a lower interest rate nowadays. Occasionally, I receive inquiries from people asking for advice on what to tell former clients who are facing foreclosure due to financial struggles because we have few if any lending options remaining to help them.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Hello Everybody – Cannot believe 2009 is going by so fast. As I stated last week – not much is really going on with changing guidelines, etc. with FHA, which is why I am going back to basics for a few weeks. Sometimes it is the basic that can be the most confusing.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.