The Trump administration’s revived plan to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is stoking fresh debate in Washington and on Wall Street, with experts warning that such a move could push mortgage rates higher and pose new challenges for homebuyers across the country. At the heart of the discussion lies a pivotal question: Can the U.S. housing market handle a shift away from government-backed mortgage guarantees?
The U.S. homebuilding sector found a modest silver lining in former President Donald Trump’s latest wave of tariff announcements. While much of the construction industry braces for higher costs, one crucial material—Canadian lumber—was notably spared from additional duties. That exemption, however, isn’t enough to ease broader concerns across the housing market, where rising costs and slowing demand are already testing builders' limits.
The U.S. homebuilding sector is feeling the heat as fresh tariff threats from former President Donald Trump’s policy platform stir up anxiety over rising construction costs, casting a shadow over what was shaping up to be a fragile housing market recovery. Shares of major homebuilders—like D.R. Horton, Lennar, PulteGroup, Toll Brothers, KB Home, Taylor Morrison, and Meritage Homes—have slid noticeably in recent days as investors weigh the potential financial fallout from escalating trade measures.
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has rescinded a number of appraisal policies instituted during the Biden Administration. In a Mortgagee Letter released last week, FHA rescinded three previous Mortgagee Letters released during the previous administration, effectively restoring the policies in place prior to these three letters.
Mortgage professionals can now access FICO’s Score Mortgage Simulator on the Xactus360 Verification Platform, the companies announced earlier this month. FICO announced the tool in October. It’s designed to simulate potential impacts to a consumer’s FICO score with hypothetical changes in credit report data. Examples include a potential borrower reducing their credit card balance or getting rid of a collection account.
Very recently I had a conversation with a fellow underwriter who, while she was underwriting a case which was rated an Approve/Eligible, found several items of concern within the loan documentation as submitted by the borrower. These items where located in standard documents submitted to establish income and assets sufficient to close.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
We have seen a lot of changes in the past two several years where mortgage underwriting is concerned and it now seems as if things have come full circle. Several years ago we watched as Automated Underwriting Methods replaced more traditional risk assessment methods and documentation requirements lessened just to return to a more traditional risk assessment methods including increased documentation and merging AUS methods with manual methods.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
As we forge ahead in this very uncertain market property appraisals have become an issue. HUD has even gotten into the act changing their approach from “there is no clear definition of a declining market” to the issuance of ML letter 2009-09, which adopted the use of the Market Conditions Addendum as well as provided further guidance and requirements for properties located in a declining markets such as the use of active listings as well as requiring that two comparable sales provided in the appraisal report be comparables that have closed within 90 days of the effective date of the appraisal.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Now that we are in full swing where the FHA originations are concerned, there are several practices which exist where FHA lending is concerned that are not associated with conventional or even sub-prime lending. Completing some of these tasks requires cooperation among lenders and brokers, more particularly case number assignments.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
As we all gallantly return to the FHA market, I thought this week would be a good week to discuss something that a lot of underwriters are currently experiencing and that is plying through test cases.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Recently I had the pleasure of teaching an FHA DE Underwriting class. The class, which is presented by FHA Online University (http://www.FHAtraining.org), is one of my favorites to teach. As opposed to the nuts and bolts of FHA underwriting practices and guidelines it takes on a more subjective perspective to underwriting, the why’s and what if’s if you would.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
With all of the recent changes to investor guidelines concerning minimum credit score requirements and the ever so popular dependency on Automated Underwriting Tools, I have been thinking a lot about what other tools are available to underwriters and support staff alike that might just bring the otherwise deserving borrowers into realm of homeownership.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
About 4 months ago I was out and about with one of my Account Executives. He had asked me a few days before if I would come out and say hello to his brokers, perhaps provide some training and maybe some insight as to how we get things done from an underwriting standpoint at the bank.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
As we embark on the new age of fully documenting income and assets for each case, it is important to remember that creativity is key. Often we have borrowers that do not fit into the traditional molds therefore making it a little more difficult to completely document their income in the traditional sense.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Over the course of the most recent few years, underwriting guidelines have steered away from the more traditional assessment of financial risk to the product matrix. If the loan application met all the criteria as set forth in product matrix then the case was approvable for the most part.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.